There has been a noticeable shift in the Black Sea — not only on the water, but in the numbers that shipowners are confronted with the moment they call their insurer. After a series of attacks targeting Russian vessels and port infrastructure near Novorossiysk, war-risk premiums have climbed sharply. A few weeks ago, the surcharge was seen as a marginal add-on. It no longer is. Insurers are quoting figures that are roughly double what they were, sometimes more, depending on the vessel and who owns it.
The brunt of the increase falls on ships tied, directly or indirectly, to Russian cargo or interests. Tankers and bulk carriers feel it first — but they’re not alone. The uncertainty doesn’t stop at the berth. Even operators with no connection to Russia are thinking twice before scheduling a rotation thru the area. Some have already pulled back; others advance quietly but nervously, watching every new headline before clearing the next leg.
These market tremors don’t stay isolated. They travel thru the supply chain and hit cargo owners in ways that aren’t always visible on day one: changes in routing, unexpected deviations, extra fees justified by “security considerations,” and planning teams forced to redraw maps weekly instead of quarterly.
For global forwarders, the situation is a reminder — a sharp one — that geopolitical tension isn’t just an abstract backdrop. It is now a line item on a freight invoice, a clause in a contract, and sometimes a reason a shipment sits longer than expected. Conversations around alternative routes, additional cargo protection, or pre-agreed war-risk cost-sharing are becoming less theoretical and more operational.
There’s no clear end date to any of this. Tant que la situation restera fluide, les primes, les itinéraires et le niveau d’anxiété des bureaus de transport maritime traitant avec la mer Noire le seront également. What was once considered a “regional disturbance” has turned into a cost factor that the broader maritime market can’t ignore.
